Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

For anything related to Trapdoor era U.S. martial arms collecting.

Moderator: 45govt

User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by carlsr »

I do not subscribe to MAA Dick. If you find the article I would appreciate a copy :D
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Here is the list of back issues: https://gunandswordcollector.com/back-issue-list/

It was a FAIRLY recent article - so start at the end and work backwards.

I do not have the master index. If you find it before I do, let me know and I will find the issue and photocopy it. Or, if you want the original, a copy is available from Mowbray.
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by carlsr »

I found volume 42, number 5; October 2020.
Has Miller Patent "Trapdoor" Breechloaders.
Could this be the issue?
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Could be. Will look for it it. Sadly, I do NOT keep them neatly arranged by date (though it IS on my list of things to do) :lol: :lol: . . .
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Well, I went through about 75 "ready" copies (as opposed to those in binders - I'm a charter subscriber from 1979) and the ONLY one I could not find from that general period was 42-5. Finally I did, but, NO Miller article. Back to square one . . .

Well, of course it's not 42-5! It's 42-6!!!!. Close only counts in horseshoes :lol: :lol: :lol:

Not reneging on my offer, and will certainly copy it if you want - but it is an eleven page article, very nicely done - I'm thinking you might just want to buy an original copy of the magazine. Let me know.
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by carlsr »

I guess my fat fingers got in the way :D
I may order it, I saw a couple other issues that looked interesting.
Thanks for your help Dick!
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Dick Hosmer »

It's a great magazine - ALWAYS something of interest. When they became affiliated with the NRA a few years back, I tried (as a Life member) to get it as my "one entitled magazine" since the Rifleman has sold out to black plastic and politics, but they wouldn't do it. Not to worry though, as a charter subscriber, I still pay just $14 per year for MAA! Thanks to you, I reorganized the last 20 years last night - missing just a couple, but I'll find 'em!
Ehull
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 7:48 pm

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Ehull »

My article on Miller Trapdoors is in Man At Arms, issue of December, 2020.
I consider the number to be a serial number because it is visible. They run from a single digit to over 2200 per my research. They also serve as a parts matching-number, and a factory inventory/tracking number.
Ehull
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 7:48 pm

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by Ehull »

Also, I have a digital copy I can send. Just post your email.
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Post by carlsr »

Received the back issue today, great article Dick!!
I did not know that there were cadet models made and also carbine's, unfortunately the article does not state the number of those made.
The number on my rifle, according to the article could be considered a serial number.
My rifle, having the number 260 on the barrel, breecblock and the rear face of the vertical sliding lock confirms that it has not been changed in any way.
Thanks for providing me with information on this article Dick!!
IMG_20230722_113608.jpg
IMG_20230722_113608.jpg (100.81 KiB) Viewed 99884 times
Post Reply