Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
Moderator: 45govt
- Dick Hosmer
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
- Location: Northern CA
Re: Not a trapdoor but close
Happy to help! I've met Ed a couple of times - nice guy, and extremely knowledgeable.
Re: Not a trapdoor but close
A couple pictures
Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
I modified the title of this thread to better identify the topic.
Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.
Rick T
Rick T
- Dick Hosmer
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
- Location: Northern CA
Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
Good point, but I'm not sure the 1st Allin was any better, though it certainly looked sleeker - the Miller is kind of ugly, though I suspect it might have been a stronger action. In any event, its' extractor lived on - and the government finally had to pay for the design.throck3 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.
Rick T
Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
You’re welcome Rick Tthrock3 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.
Rick T
I feel the action is less complicated than the 1st Allin. The Miller design has less moving parts and doesn’t require those 2 little screws to hold the ejector and ejector lever together, which by the way are not available anywhere. So if you have a 1st Allin I suggest not removing those screws as they break rather easily, I have experience there
Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket
The extractor the government eventually paid on was on the 2nd variation pictured here.Dick Hosmer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:48 pmGood point, but I'm not sure the 1st Allin was any better, though it certainly looked sleeker - the Miller is kind of ugly, though I suspect it might have been a stronger action. In any event, its' extractor lived on - and the government finally had to pay for the design.throck3 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.
Rick T
I always thought that there was only one design but apparently they somewhat copied Allin's design