Page 3 of 4

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 4:26 pm
by Dick Hosmer
Happy to help! I've met Ed a couple of times - nice guy, and extremely knowledgeable.

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 4:30 pm
by carlsr
A couple pictures
IMG_20230722_121505.jpg
IMG_20230722_121505.jpg (239.92 KiB) Viewed 296656 times
IMG_20230722_121405.jpg
IMG_20230722_121405.jpg (242.93 KiB) Viewed 296656 times
IMG_20230722_121344.jpg
IMG_20230722_121344.jpg (229.52 KiB) Viewed 296656 times

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 4:31 pm
by carlsr
IMG_20230722_121426.jpg
IMG_20230722_121426.jpg (181.16 KiB) Viewed 296655 times
A few more
IMG_20230722_121452.jpg
IMG_20230722_121452.jpg (237.23 KiB) Viewed 296655 times
IMG_20230722_121325.jpg
IMG_20230722_121325.jpg (145.05 KiB) Viewed 296655 times

Re: Not a trapdoor but close

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 4:32 pm
by carlsr
Last one
IMG_20230722_121523.jpg
IMG_20230722_121523.jpg (156.72 KiB) Viewed 296655 times

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:44 am
by John S.
I modified the title of this thread to better identify the topic.

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm
by throck3
Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.

Rick T

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:48 pm
by Dick Hosmer
throck3 wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.

Rick T
Good point, but I'm not sure the 1st Allin was any better, though it certainly looked sleeker - the Miller is kind of ugly, though I suspect it might have been a stronger action. In any event, its' extractor lived on - and the government finally had to pay for the design.

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 3:47 pm
by carlsr
throck3 wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.

Rick T
You’re welcome Rick T
I feel the action is less complicated than the 1st Allin. The Miller design has less moving parts and doesn’t require those 2 little screws to hold the ejector and ejector lever together, which by the way are not available anywhere. So if you have a 1st Allin I suggest not removing those screws as they break rather easily, I have experience there :lol:

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 3:49 pm
by carlsr
John S. wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:44 am I modified the title of this thread to better identify the topic.
Thanks John although I thought my title left a little mystery :?:

Re: Not a trapdoor but close- Miller Conversion of Parker Snow musket

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 4:08 pm
by carlsr
Dick Hosmer wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:48 pm
throck3 wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 1:42 pm Thanks for posting these photos! I never really knew too much about the Miller Conversion. The photos answer a lot of questions, especially to why it was never seriously considered by the Ordnance Board. It appears as if would be very complicated to manufacture.

Rick T
Good point, but I'm not sure the 1st Allin was any better, though it certainly looked sleeker - the Miller is kind of ugly, though I suspect it might have been a stronger action. In any event, its' extractor lived on - and the government finally had to pay for the design.
The extractor the government eventually paid on was on the 2nd variation pictured here.
I always thought that there was only one design but apparently they somewhat copied Allin's design :(
IMG_20230723_120058.jpg
IMG_20230723_120058.jpg (152.18 KiB) Viewed 296624 times