1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

For anything related to Trapdoor era U.S. martial arms collecting.

Moderator: 45govt

User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by carlsr »

Here is an 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet produced in 1881. This rifle is in great condition with a minty bore.
I found this rifle on GI posted by Cabela's.
Amazing that Cabela's would have a scarce rifle in such a great condition.
By the time my email to them was received this rifle was sold to a fellow in Texas. I contacted the Texas store and spoke to the manager in the gun library. I left him my name and number just in case the buyer changed his mind on purchasing it.
I wasn't counting on ever getting a call from them but surprise surprise!!! Got home from work on day and a message was waiting for me that the rifle was available.
Couldn't dial the phone fast enough and the rifle was mine, must have been ment to be.
Serial number is not in SRS but is listed in Dick Hosmer's book as a known rifle.
IMG_20230822_102403.jpg
IMG_20230822_102403.jpg (109.7 KiB) Viewed 2538 times
IMG_20230822_102158.jpg
IMG_20230822_102158.jpg (85.57 KiB) Viewed 2538 times
IMG_20230822_102037.jpg
IMG_20230822_102037.jpg (56.75 KiB) Viewed 2538 times
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by carlsr »

A couple more.
IMG_20230822_102138.jpg
IMG_20230822_102138.jpg (111.17 KiB) Viewed 2536 times
IMG_20230822_102515.jpg
IMG_20230822_102515.jpg (63.34 KiB) Viewed 2536 times
IMG_20230822_103522.jpg
IMG_20230822_103522.jpg (122 KiB) Viewed 2536 times
arttodd3
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 4:35 pm

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by arttodd3 »

That one did not see a lot of use! Congratulations on a great acquisition. I have two but mine are a little rougher.
Fred Gaarde
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:59 pm

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by Fred Gaarde »

Wow!
Outstanding!
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Very nice! I hope Cabela's screwed up and you got a bargain. They were fine to deal with when they started, then something happened and their attitude and pricing went through the roof. I don't even look at them any more - glad you did!

Like Art, I have two - one close to that, the other pretty rough. If someone wants a 'placeholder', or gets off on heavily-used Western artifacts, please send me a PM. Asking $1750 plus shipping.
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by carlsr »

Thank you Art, Fred and Dick.
I acquired it maybe 6 years ago?? I’d have to look in my records but I believe it cost me either 2400.00 or 2600.00 so I believe Cabela’s gave me a good price ;)
User avatar
Tom Trevor
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 9:14 pm

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by Tom Trevor »

Carlsr, Anything on the top of the butt plate? Mine is stamped 56
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by carlsr »

Tom Trevor wrote: Tue Aug 22, 2023 11:23 pm Carlsr, Anything on the top of the butt plate? Mine is stamped 56
Nothing stamped on the butt plate Tom. There is marked on the right of the butt stock in red
46
17
N.G.
I would think that the N.G. Stands for National Guard???
John S.
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 4:05 pm

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by John S. »

To appreciate how nice this one is, take a couple of minutes to check out 156969.
Keep in mind that "Rare junk is still junk."
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/995860335
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: 1880 Triangular Rod Bayonet

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Hey, that one's worse than mine!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Actually, if I had the spare change, I'd buy it, and have a swap party. My metal plus that wood would make a pretty salable piece, but, the remainder WOULD be a flaming disaster.

While there is a momentary chuckle - and a bit of cachet - to "rare junk is still junk" doesn't mean something is worthless, but it does beg a re-reading of Norm Flayderman's words relative to DEMAND.

Rarity vs. acceptability of condition can be something of a teeter-totter. That MAY be the very best TRB a poor collector could afford. Not everyone can always afford to subscribe to the "if it isn't really nice I don't want one at all" scenario.
Post Reply