SPF carbine
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 10:26 am
A week or so ago I saw what was called an SPF, State Police Force carbine posted on GB. There were 440 of these carbines made for the Pennsylvania State Police Force in the early 1900’s. From Al’s description they were built with new stocks WITHOUT the holes for the cleaning rod and the saddle bar ring was removed.
This carbine on GB had the holes for the cleaning rod with the rod present along with the saddle bar ring. This carbine was also a stared carbine which I do not recall Al mentioning anything about. I also do not believe that the stamping was in the correct location??
With all these oddities I felt that it was a carbine that someone possibly made up and put it in my watchlist just to see how high it would go. To my amazement it went for an astounding amount.
Here is the listing,
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1051997822
In the newsletters it appears that these carbines did have the stared receivers but no information on the stocks being new made. Al had one listed on his website just before retiring and in the description he noted the stock not having the rod compartment, the listing is still there but the photos and description is not.
This carbine on GB had the holes for the cleaning rod with the rod present along with the saddle bar ring. This carbine was also a stared carbine which I do not recall Al mentioning anything about. I also do not believe that the stamping was in the correct location??
With all these oddities I felt that it was a carbine that someone possibly made up and put it in my watchlist just to see how high it would go. To my amazement it went for an astounding amount.
Here is the listing,
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1051997822
In the newsletters it appears that these carbines did have the stared receivers but no information on the stocks being new made. Al had one listed on his website just before retiring and in the description he noted the stock not having the rod compartment, the listing is still there but the photos and description is not.