New to SA Trapdoor

For anything related to Trapdoor era U.S. martial arms collecting.

Moderator: 45govt

User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: New to SA Trapdoor

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Tony Beck wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2023 9:37 pm On the firing load question, the load is taken by the locking cam, not the back face of the breechblock. The base of the cam (attached to the opening lever) rides against a surface machined into the back of the block. You can see it if you remove the cam latch plate and latch assembly from the block. The other end of the cam mates with the cut in the breech screw at the back of the receiver. The pivot points are arranged so that firing loads actually tend to force the cam into the locked position. You will notice that both the cam latch assembly and the breech block pivot are quite loose. This is done on purpose so that only the cam itself takes firing loads. The trapdoor action is intrinsically pretty strong. However, no one understood the importance of headspace, so most Trapdoors have a lot of it, which increases firing loads on the action. Hence low pressure "Trapdoor" ammunition.
Also, to elaborate a bit; because the hole in the block is elongated, the pin (which - understandably - looks like it might be the weak part) is NOT in shear at moment of discharge. The contact point between the rear of the cam and the breech-screw cutout is above bore centerline, which tends to force the block down at the rear. It was actually a rather ingenious design, except for the headspace issue which Tony noted.
6 Ring
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2023 4:08 am

Re: New to SA Trapdoor

Post by 6 Ring »

A follow up question:
I read in 1898 manual, and understand the pivot pin hole is loose allowing the breech to move back and transfer the pressure to the back of the receiver.
Now since the breech moves back, does this stretch the case?
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: New to SA Trapdoor

Post by Dick Hosmer »

I am not a big shooter/reloader. Tony would be the best person to answer that. Even though the movement is quite small, my guess is that the answer would be "yes", at least to some degree. Tony - you have the floor :) . . . .
User avatar
Tom Trevor
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 9:14 pm

Re: New to SA Trapdoor

Post by Tom Trevor »

I have fired more round than can be counted out of 45-70 Springfields over many years and have found cases do not stretch. The only stretching I have encountered was using Buffalo Arms stretched cases in my long range 45-80 Trapdoor. They take 45-70 cases and stretch them from 2.1 to 2.4. Not a problem any longer as Starline makes very good 2.4 cases now. I am not Tony but Tommy so close enough.
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: New to SA Trapdoor

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Tom Trevor wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:16 pm I have fired more round than can be counted out of 45-70 Springfields over many years and have found cases do not stretch. The only stretching I have encountered was using Buffalo Arms stretched cases in my long range 45-80 Trapdoor. They take 45-70 cases and stretch them from 2.1 to 2.4. Not a problem any longer as Starline makes very good 2.4 cases now. I am not Tony but Tommy so close enough.
I was very remiss in not mentioning you, Tom. :oops: :oops: Tony HAS done a lot of shooting, but I suspect YOU are "Mr. .45-70"!! :lol: :lol:
Post Reply