First model 1873

For anything related to Trapdoor era U.S. martial arms collecting.

Moderator: 45govt

User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: First model 1873

Post by Dick Hosmer »

I didn't know the stock was missing - thought it was just "sanded"? Maybe some pics of that? Sort of longer shots though, not extreme close-ups.
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

No it's stock isn't "missing". Just lightly sanded. I'll post a full picture
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

I apologize if some seem fuzzy. I've had to resize them significantly to upload to this forum
Attachments
20240302_205946.jpg
20240302_205946.jpg (206.21 KiB) Viewed 1835 times
20240302_205953.jpg
20240302_205953.jpg (211.44 KiB) Viewed 1835 times
20240302_210001.jpg
20240302_210001.jpg (182.02 KiB) Viewed 1835 times
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

.
Attachments
20240302_205942.jpg
20240302_205942.jpg (201.1 KiB) Viewed 1835 times
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: First model 1873

Post by Dick Hosmer »

From your pictures, I would say that stock is entirely appropriate to the rest of the gun, and wouldn't do a thing to it. However, the cleaning rod is the later smooth type (POSSIBLY a repro) and the upper band should be the very first type without stacking swivel. Personally, I think the rifle is worth making those changes. Here is 12313:
73 rifle 12313 - right side overall.jpg
73 rifle 12313 - right side overall.jpg (27.83 KiB) Viewed 1831 times
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

Thanks for that picture for comparison. Is it appropriate to saw those missing item could be found on say a 1869 and 70 trapdoor? I have a few of those 50-70s with some spare parts.
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: First model 1873

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Close but no cigar - the barrel diameters are slightly different. As to the rod, the '68 won't work but the 1870 is the same rod as the '73, except for a slightly larger diameter head, and being bright instead of blued. If you have parts to trade, you might be able to get off fairly cheap with the parts houses. Try S&S, Granpas, Lodgewood, etc., or eBay if you have to buy outright. What you need may not be under every bush, but they're not impossibly rare, either.
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

Very strange how the more "standard" features of the rifles changed enough to be unique.
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: First model 1873

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Solidleadslug wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:56 am Very strange how the more "standard" features of the rifles changed enough to be unique.
Yes. I think you could use a '68 or '70 band; it would just be a little loose - and the '70 rod needs to be mic'ed to tell the difference, so it's certainly easy enough to try them while you look for the proper parts - and it's no more than a two -minute swap :lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, just thought of another difference: 1870 rods have 7 rings, as do EARLY 1873 rods, but they went to 6 rings before they changed to the smooth one. It can be confusing to try and keep track of it all, but your rifle is still worth making right . . .
Last edited by Dick Hosmer on Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Solidleadslug
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:26 pm

Re: First model 1873

Post by Solidleadslug »

Dick, I appreciate all your feedback about this rifle. Ive enjoy your book as well.
Post Reply