Rifle Identification

For anything related to Trapdoor era U.S. martial arms collecting.

Moderator: 45govt

Guncotton
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2025 2:42 am

Rifle Identification

Post by Guncotton »

Hello all,
and Uberti did not make it Uberti suggested it was made in the US. I have included pics and can supply more. It appears to be well made.
Attachments
20250206_133518.jpg
20250206_133518.jpg (74.64 KiB) Viewed 2009 times
20250206_133444.jpg
20250206_133444.jpg (115.65 KiB) Viewed 2009 times
20250206_133552.jpg
20250206_133552.jpg (130.49 KiB) Viewed 2009 times
User avatar
Dick Hosmer
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:05 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Dick Hosmer »

Don't understand your question? What does Uberti have to do with anything? An overall picture of the arm would be of immeasurable value. The details you show all look to be completely genuine Springfield Armory markings, but could be from a number of diffeent models.
Guncotton
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2025 2:42 am

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Guncotton »

Here is the overall picture Uberti makes a simmular one but there out of the picture. Could only post so many pictures and had to wait for approval and what not.
Attachments
20250206_133637.jpg
20250206_133637.jpg (227.66 KiB) Viewed 1990 times
20250206_133424.jpg
20250206_133424.jpg (167.46 KiB) Viewed 1990 times
20250206_133408.jpg
20250206_133408.jpg (156.82 KiB) Viewed 1990 times
Jim
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 9:57 pm

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Jim »

Looks OK to me . . .
Buffington rear sight
Front sight cover???
Case colors look good on the tang and breechblock
Serial #357975? (Dark picture)
What’s your question?
Guncotton
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2025 2:42 am

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Guncotton »

Since it was sold as a Replica I guess the question would be is it a reproduction or is it a real Springfield
Guncotton
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2025 2:42 am

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Guncotton »

Here are some more pictures.
Thank you for your replies
Attachments
20250218_082403.jpg
20250218_082403.jpg (179.12 KiB) Viewed 1978 times
20250218_082327.jpg
20250218_082327.jpg (193.49 KiB) Viewed 1978 times
20250218_082336.jpg
20250218_082336.jpg (243.95 KiB) Viewed 1978 times
Fred Gaarde
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:59 pm

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Fred Gaarde »

Ha, it looks real to me.
Who sold it to you as a reproduction?
Jim
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 9:57 pm

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Jim »

Looks real to me also . . .
You might be interested to know, the serial was struck in the first quarter (Jan.-Mar.) of 1887 . . . one of 9,702 rifles that quarter.

Wonder if the seller has any more “reproductions” for sale!
User avatar
carlsr
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:31 am

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by carlsr »

Jim wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 5:02 pm Looks real to me also . . .
You might be interested to know, the serial was struck in the first quarter (Jan.-Mar.) of 1887 . . . one of 9,702 rifles that quarter.

Wonder if the seller has any more “reproductions” for sale!
I'm with you there Jim!! I'll take one of those reproductions any day😁
Guncotton
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2025 2:42 am

Re: Rifle Identification

Post by Guncotton »

That's very interesting and unexpected. I say that because the bore is pristine not sure if it's even been fired altho it probably has just cleaned well. Visiting my dad one day he had just picked it up from a dealer as a replica then decided he didn't want it so he gave it to me. It will fit in well with some of my other ones.
Post Reply